Latour Trading LLC has been charged with violating rules designed to ensure safe and efficient markets.
The high-frequency proprietary trading firm agreed to a settlement in which it will pay a $5 million civil penalty and more than $3 million of disgorgement of gross trading profits, rebates paid to it by exchanges, and prejudgment interest, the Securities and Exchange Commission said in a Sept. 30 press release.
An investigation found that Latour violated the SEC rules–the Market Access Rule and Regulation National Market System–over a nearly four-year period in which Latour sent millions of non-compliant orders to US exchanges. According to the order:
“Automated trading systems can pose significant risks to the market and must be designed and implemented correctly,” said Andrew Ceresney, director of the SEC’s Enforcement Division. “Firms that do not have control over their trading systems can undermine the integrity of our markets by sending millions of orders that violate SEC and stock exchange rules that promote fair and orderly trading, like Latour did in this case.”
According to the SEC’s order, from October 2010 through August 2014, Latour sent approximately 12.6 million orders for more than 4.6 billion shares that did not comply with the requirements of Regulation NMS. The orders at issue were intermarket sweep orders (ISOs), which trading centers may immediately execute at prices that might otherwise appear to violate Rule 611 of Regulation NMS. Rule 611 generally requires trades to be executed at the best available displayed price, but trading centers may execute ISOs immediately based on the ISO router’s obligation to send additional orders to execute against any better-priced displayed quotations.
Chiefly because of the coding problem, Latour’s ISOs did not meet the requirements and caused more than 1.1 million trade-throughs (trades executed at a price worse than the best available price) and more 1.7 million locked or crossed markets (when the national best bid equals or exceeds the national best offer). Latour also sent non-compliant ISOs as a result of incorrectly relying on information about orders that Latour had previously sent. In addition to violations of the Market Access Rule, the SEC’s order also finds that Latour violated Rule 611(c) of Regulation NMS because it did not take reasonable steps to establish that its ISOs complied with Reg NMS.
Robert A. Cohen, co-chief of the Enforcement Division’s Market Abuse Unit added, “Market structure violations can have a real if sometimes subtle impact on our markets. Latour received executions and collected exchange rebates that it should not have and that other market participants might have received if not for Latour’s non-compliant orders.”
Without admitting or denying the findings, Latour consented to the SEC’s order, which requires it to cease and desist from committing or causing violations of Section 15(c)(3) of the Exchange Act and Rule 15c3-5 thereunder and Rule 611(c) of Regulation NMS. Latour agreed to pay a $5 million penalty, disgorgement of $2,784,875 of gross trading profits and exchange-paid rebates, plus prejudgment interest of $268,564.