Information security professionals expect 2016 presidential candidates to have a firm grasp on cybersecurity issues if they hope to win their support, according to a recent survey conducted by Tripwire, Inc., a security firm.
“There is a big difference between a candidate who has a cybersecurity policy and a candidate who has an understanding of cybersecurity,” said Dwayne Melancon, chief technology officer for Tripwire. “In the past, there have been unrealistic expectations regarding the government’s role in the cybersecurity space as well as difficulties in passing effective legislation. It will be important for candidates to not only articulate their concern for cybersecurity, but to also share a concrete plan on how they will incorporate the expertise of respected experts, who can help craft practical, effective and sustainable cybersecurity policies.”
According to Tripwire’s survey, more than two-thirds (68 percent) of information security professionals would prefer to vote for a presidential candidate who has a strong cybersecurity policy. When asked what role cybersecurity policy and regulation will play in the upcoming presidential election, more than half of respondents (54 percent) said it would be a key issue. On the other hand, 32 percent of respondents felt that while most candidates can discuss cybersecurity, their comments will be largely rhetoric. Only 14 percent of respondents believe cybersecurity will not be a key issue in the upcoming election.
“Politicians haven’t become more literate on the cybersecurity issue, but they certainly have become more aware of the financial results of inaction,” said Tim Erlin, director of IT security and risk strategy for Tripwire. “There’s no doubt that recent incidents have raised the political profile of cybersecurity in this country, driven not by a renewed interest in technology, but by the increasingly disastrous effects of successful attacks. While the majority of respondents view cybersecurity policy as a key issue, there has been little agreement on the details of how government should be involved.”